Welcome

Dennis Jones is a Jamaican-born international economist, who has lived most of the time in the UK and USA, and latterly in Guinea, west Africa. He moved back to the Caribbean in 2007. This blog contains his observations on life on this small eastern Caribbean island, as well as views on life and issues on a broader landscape, especially the Caribbean and Africa.

*NEW!!! LISTEN TO BLOG POSTS FEATURE ADDED!!!*

*PLEASE READ COMMENTS POLICY--NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS, PLEASE*

*REFERENCES TO NEWSPAPER OR MEDIA REPORTS ARE USUALLY FOLLOWED BY LINKS TO ACTUAL REPORTS*

*IMAGES MAY BE ENLARGED BY CLICKING ON THEM*

*SUBSCRIBE TO THIS BLOG BY E-MAIL (SEE BOX IN SIDE BAR)*


______________________________________

**You may contact me by e-mail at livinginbarbados[at]gmail[dot]com**

Sunday, January 13, 2008

Election issues in Barbados and Taiwan

Just three very quick updates with a slant on the elections in Barbados.

First, a CHAPO/Boxill poll conducted by two UWI academics (Prof. Ian Boxill and Dion Greenidge) in early January put the BLP ahead of DLP by 41.5% to 36.2%, with a margin of error of +/- 3%. The poll projects that the vote will be between 50-53% for BLP and between 47-50% for DLP, giving BLP a margin of maybe 5 seats. This is not so out of line with the recent CADRES poll (that had a +/- 5% margin of error), not "poles (or polls) apart" as one radio station hails.The two polls indicate that the election will be close. The CHAPO/Boxill poll indicates clearly, as did the CADRES poll, that Owen Arthur has a substantial lead in people's minds as the best leader, with 48% support against David Thompson's 33%. That could be a major factor as over 50% of voters say they will be swayed by consideration of particular MP and choice of Prime Minister. Both polls are also clear that the major (over 50%) voter concern by far is the cost of living, and this is rising. There will be a lot of chewing over the numbers but the voting day is really close and the voting will be very close.

Second, I do not know enough about the various MPs to have a strong view to express here, but one contest will be very close and I feel very heated. That is the race for St. Michael North West, between Clyde Mascoll (BLP) and Christopher Sinckler (DLP). Mr. Mascoll is the government spokesman on economic and financial affairs, but he was elected as DLP MP but crossed the floor two years ago. In the British-type parliamentary system such a change does not require a by-election or renewal of the MP's mandate under his new party's hat. Now voters can have their say about the change of party, whether they really like the candidate, and more. Mr. Mascoll's portfolio is a hot one and his rise to "co-leader" status in the BLP may make him loved by fewer on either side of the party divide. He is quoted in the Sunday Sun as saying to a crowd of BLP supporters "Deep in your hearts, you know I deserve to be a Member of Parliament". These could be prophetic words. This is the race to watch for me.

Third, Taiwan's voters went to the polls this week and elected the opposition Nationalist Party to a landslide victory in legislative elections, winning 81 of 113 seats. This is a big dent for the policies of Taiwan's president Chen Shui-bian and his drive to formalise the de facto independence from the People's Republic of China (PRC). The president resigned immediately as chairman of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party. Some critics point to this policy as having dented Taiwan's competitiveness and greatly increasing tensions with the PRC. Presidential election are due March 22, 2008, and the Nationalists now have a 20% lead with their candidate Ma Ying-jeou. This election victory should be borne in mind when thinking of recent accusations of Barbados' DLP getting funding from Taiwan.

2 comments:

zanne said...

I am presuming that the DPP (as the ruling party) would have provided the funding then? Wouldn't the Taiwanese have been too busy with their own elections to be involved here?

Dennis Jones said...

When charges of political parties getting funding from foreign entities are thrown around it's sometimes hard to know if the truth is that a foreigner has done such funding with the knowledge of his/her government, and if so whether this is part of some deliberate policy. It could be overt or covert government action, or it could be an individual's gesture. The issues arise if there are clear rules about political funding. If they don't exist then there is a lot of hot air flowing.

Depending on a range of factors you would also need to look beyond funding of political parties and consider other forms of foreign inflows and see/know where the money goes. If Saudi princes are investing in Bajan real estate projects, for instance, who are the ultimate beneficiaries? One needs to do some serious, deep and difficult analyses to figure out what is really going on.