Watching how the government deals with the current drought in Barbados is an interesting lesson in crisis management. The notice that is published in today's newspapers shows that the government/Barbados Water Authority (BWA) feels that despite the extensive dry period that has been hitting the island, and also many other islands in the Caribbean area, it feels that voluntary restraint is all that is needed now. Stage 1, which is what the BWA has now instituted, by 'encouraging customers to practise good water use habits and employ voluntary conservation measures' is something that should really be a basic aspect of how life is lived in a water scarce country.I'm one of those who thinks that voluntary measures would have been appropriate much earlier, if only to put into people's minds that the situation was grave some weeks ago, could get very serious, and that would require stiffer responses, including mandatory daytime shut-offs.
Having Stage 2 (which will be 'if the situation demands', whatever on Earth that means) may involve official prohibition and night-time shut offs in selected areas as a next step begs the question of how bad the situation needs to be before that stage is implemented. Stage 3, 'if the situation does not improve', will involve 'more austere measures' and 'extended shut-offs...even during the day'. To me, it is a wishy-washy approach that suggests that because 'most of our water systems have stood up relatively well when compared to our neighbours', and that Barbadians do not need to rethink radically how they approach water use. It seems to leave people with a sense of satisfaction that by having done nothing so far, the country has had enough of a response. So, the fact that some areas are having water problems and the numerous bush fires are almost normal. That does not seem to be the right message and response.Judging by the way that some people around me on Monday evening scurried in a panic when they started getting messages on their phones that there would be water shut offs with immediate effect. Anger that this could happen without prior warning quickly turned to a mad rush to go home and fill buckets. Within a day, the BWA was indicating that the messages were a hoax. But, people seem primed for a need for a very drastic limitation on regular water use. Should the government not encourage that response more vigorously?
