Welcome

Dennis Jones is a Jamaican-born international economist, who has lived most of the time in the UK and USA, and latterly in Guinea, west Africa. He moved back to the Caribbean in 2007. This blog contains his observations on life on this small eastern Caribbean island, as well as views on life and issues on a broader landscape, especially the Caribbean and Africa.

*NEW!!! LISTEN TO BLOG POSTS FEATURE ADDED!!!*

*PLEASE READ COMMENTS POLICY--NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS, PLEASE*

*REFERENCES TO NEWSPAPER OR MEDIA REPORTS ARE USUALLY FOLLOWED BY LINKS TO ACTUAL REPORTS*

*IMAGES MAY BE ENLARGED BY CLICKING ON THEM*

*SUBSCRIBE TO THIS BLOG BY E-MAIL (SEE BOX IN SIDE BAR)*


______________________________________

**You may contact me by e-mail at livinginbarbados[at]gmail[dot]com**
Showing posts with label Apsara Barbados. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Apsara Barbados. Show all posts

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Stay At Home. Go Do Your Work

I am always easily confused when people find good logic and a good answer then do not follow it. It's plagued me a lot over the past few weeks. Do all the hard work, then mess up at the finish.

Some people keep wondering--not in the nicest of terms, including ones last heard uttered in anger after my football studs got a goalkeeper just under his waist line--why I do not go and offer advice to Jamaica, and its ailing economy and self-destructive social misfits, rather than stay here in Barbados and gush with ideas. For me, the operative words are 'go' and 'offer'.

However it occurred--and Al Gore said it was all his idea--we no longer need to 'go' to many places to 'offer' our services. We can stay where we are and connect electronically. (Even people selling goods can show off the items very well through a web camera hook-up.) I'm often 'at home' with my Dad in Jamaica, while he looks out on his veranda and I look out onto mine--the joy of Skype--and we spend not a penny for the pleasure. His stroke prevents much travel and I have other obligations here in Bimshire.I thought the uses of teleconferencing or teleworking were blindingly obvious, but maybe they need stating. I've been using them for about 10 years now.

The new technological advancements are such that I do not even need to show up at another place to get paid: PayPal or wire transfer or some other electronic transfer can get me my dosh. I can similarly make payments online. In fact, those aspects alone would encourage me to stay put. If I take my Barbados-issued Scotiabank ATM card with me to Jamaica, well that's it for money withdrawals, bredrin. Why? Barbados has exchange controls and that denies me access to my B$ account, even though funds could easily be transferred through the same banking structure. So, why pay airfare, suffer airport delays, risk getting swine flu from contact with British tourists, run the risk of being mugged in Kingston, only to find that the Minister (or central bank Governor) has left for Washington and that I need to come back after their return? "Im soon come back, im did seh." I understand Jamaican patois--no translation needed. Go home and get on with your work.

I can also just click, order, pay online, and wait for delivery right at my door. You have to love Amazon.com, UPS, FedEx and DHL.

The other bothersome little kernel is about to whom I offer advice. I also thought that multitasking was standard, even though recent studies show that it's not as effective to do lots of things as to do only a few. It seems to some people that if I am giving advice to Barbados that I somehow cannot also be giving advice to anyone else. Well, hello! The consultants I know often do a cut and past and just search for country X and replace with country Y. What a wheeze! Two reports for the cost of one, and two pay checks. Nice one, Cyril!

I am convinced that these two 'afflictions'--the need to go to a place to function and the ability to only do one thing at a time--are not rare. In fact, they are very common in this region. My wife is often having teleconferences with colleagues in the US, but she then zips to the airport to fly to a supposedly nearby island for an hour's meeting. Dearest? So, she gets out of bed at 5.30am. She spends three hours at the airport before departing--delays are routine with LIAT. Then, she has a meeting at noon. She returns to airport for afternoon flight. Three hours wait--delays, of course--and that is without the fun of a transit through Antigua--the Gulag of LIAT. She arrives home at 11pm. "Honey, do you still love me?" she whispers a she slips into bed. I send her a text message later the next morning.

If I ask her about this, she tends to give me the "Yu madda backside" sort of reply about how she has to see X and talk with Y and give B this document. I then say, "Whatever" and go back to the veranda and get on with my work. The hum of the fan is better than the beat of the propeller; and I get food and drink not box juice and chips.

I uttered a quep (expression of derision--benefit of Scrabble played online) early this morning as I read the latest shrill calls to just pick you Georgie bundle and high tail it out of here, nuh man

I heard a man on the radio here several months ago, complaining about the traffic and how it cost him hours, etc. He then said how one morning he decided to stay home and work via his computer. Wow! No stress. Much work done. No traffic jam. If his wife had been home, who knows? Nappies in the dryer now? The next day, back again on the old routine. I wrote to the papers to point out that the man had the solution right there...telecommute.

Now, it's not all upside. If you are the philandering type and usually do that in the office or on business trips, you need to remember where you are when you are working, and have your alibi well worked out, when your wife decides that today she too will telecommute. But, I wont dwell on that sort of thing. I'm pushing one idea. Stay home. Get productive. "Minette, please pass me the mango."

Monday, August 10, 2009

I See Aliens Overhead

Space probes from Mars have identified a small place worthy of investigation. Its name is Bahbaydas, similar sounding to the Martian term for "this is our home". A space ship full of Martians is headed there as I write, and due to a crossed line on my BlackBerry, I was able to tap into information that they are using to guide their visit.

Once landed in Bahbaydas, what would they do and find? Well, they had linked to Google Earth and seen the airport, and they read the Wikipedia profiles, which show that the people are orderly but very fearful of strangers. So, they will not just crash land anywhere and cause a stir, but would hover in quietly at the designated landing area, called GAIA (which in Martian conveniently means "galactic and intergalactic arrival"). They would stand in the long lines with their passports--the biometric sensor showing; then wait with a nice rounded Redcap human; then deal with the so-called Customs operatives. They have rehearsed responses to the standard greetings, "Open yer bag. W'as dis?" with "Nada dam ting" or "Nunna u dambeysnys". Even though their translation programs have shown "phrase not known" for the responses, their frequent use suggest they are effective terms to allow passage.

Once past these first humanoid contact points, because Googling is so comprehensive, the aliens would know that the best disguise would be to morph into a British tourist. Several models could be chosen, but the most popular is that with palid face and a ruddy, freckled look; wispy hair, and a well rounded little food processor pod in front; popular add-ons include a pair of bleached ground treaders with fine hairs on them--these treaders must never be covered. A little peaked cap with "C'mon Blues" would top off the disguise perfectly. Now, entry into the rest of the island planet would be simple. The Martian direction sensors would be set to 'souf coast'. While they would have no need for shelter, suspicions would be reduced by living in rooms at one of the beachside habitat pods. Martians like huddling together, but this would show that they are neither British or from Barbados--both peoples like to stay far from each other, as can be seen from their standard meeting sign with their upper limbs pointed forward.

As this would be an initial unofficial visit, to explore only, contacts would be left at the very casual level, trying to get a sense of how these people really live, what they ate, their need for liquid intake, and how they chose their bossing persons. The intra-cranial electronic briefing tablets used on Mars indicated that astonishing progress has been made by "de true Bayjans" (the darker ones amongst of the 280,000 humans), who had used a special food to drive themselves relentlessly and work tirelessly. They call it "sweat of our brows", and it is made internally with little need for other food supplements. This food has propelled the people to invent or perfect every things Earth now holds dear. Their ceaseless toil has taken its toll, however. Most of de Bayjans are now totally mute, so making dialogue will be hard going. But, given their highly developed fear of strangers, the universal acceptance of the British tourist model may help much.

The openheartedness towards the British model is extremely hard to understand. Intergalactic intertemporal stuides show that for several hundred of their years these same British were brutal and mean to the dark ones. After bringing them across the great salt lake, promising them milk, ambrosia and honey, the British were brutish, taking the "sweat of our brows", turning it into another fuel they call "sugar" and using that for their own power. Once sugar was mixed with their "tea", taken from another people to whom they had been brutish, the British were able to conquer all of Earth. Remember, it was "de true Bayjans" "sweat" that allowed that. The British also discovered another thing. If the dark ones were left in the stick fields for many hours each day, doing mindless stick cutting, this helped maintain their colour, but it made them weaker and easier to control. The British, fearful of the sun's known radioactivity, would keep themselves in shaded places, and not damage their white radiation skin shields.

The Martians' pre-arrival intra-cranial research showed that much has changed since those days of stick tending. Many of the stick fields are still evident, but few of the dark ones will stand in them, fearing further weakening. They have found another people, whom they call "Gayaneez" (meaning "unclean ones"), who are fleeing their own nearby land, as it sinks back into the jungle. The Gayaneez now stand in the stick fields to work for "de true Bayjans". They are also now being used to build many new habitation pods. They need little space themselves, and are happy to be stacked on top of each other, with a sheet between each.

But the original natives, natually improving on the Britihs, now use the "sugar" to make a juice that is similar to basic rocket fuel. They call this "raham". Here the Martians have discovered they will have a problem. Once injested, this fuel turns de Bayjans into believing they are fearsome warriors, whose muteness is overcome and their tongues work feverishly, uttering words without meaning and keeping moist their food pod entrance craters. The original British found de Bayjans unable to do anything useful once they drank "raham".

The originail British also found they could not live comfortably in hot places: their ability to breed was impaired and they feared for their existence if they bred with natives like de Bayjans, so most returned to their original place, named 'Blighty' in their native tongue. They left behind some of their own to report on developments, and these were forbidden to ever mix openly with the dark ones. Some, of course, quickly and often broke this sacred rule. The dark ones, after years of stick tending, and "raham" drinking, and are now impervious to almost all things.

On Mars, all communication is intercranial, with no need for spoken words. Initial research had left the Martians excited, when of all the places on Earth, Bahbaydas seemed more like their planet, with its sparse vegetation and little water. When they noticed that de Bayjans were not talking to each other, they assumed that they too used intercranial communication. Furhter research showed how the old mouthpieces had become severaly damaged by too much "raham" intake. Now, the Martians needed to find out how de Bayjans did communicate. On Mars, infomation flows freely from head to head and is absorbed by merely breathing. The Martians had seen de Bayjans following an interesting olden practice of reading--using the eyes to transmit information to the brain, sometimes with the mouth moving to speed the transfer--but this reading was from a material not known on Mars and looked like thick gossamer. Once the information had been asbsorbed this way, de Bayjans tended to crumple the material and throw it into the land for biodegradation, and it was also used to make beds for some wild animals.

But, important and revolutionary changes have happened recently. A mutant speciies has developed among de Bayjans. They dwell in dark underground places, and call themselves 'Blorgas'. They fear the light, and years staying out of sight and underground have disfigured their faces so that they cannot be recognised. We deduce the name Blorgas comes from Earth words 'blow' (to push wind') and 'gas' (one of the invisible chemicals known on Earth, and often produced in great quantities by de Bayjans after drinking "raham").

The mutant Blorgas have split into two tribes. One tribe, all dark ones, travel with the chant "Beyoo". The other tribe, of some mixed offspring and others with close blood ties to the British who were abandoned in Bahbaydas, travel with the chant "Beyoo Fee Pee". No translation programs can give meaning to these chants. Some research suggest that the tribes have bllod ties, but this they deny. Each tribe is small, but is growing in influence. The spread of their influence holds many clues for the success of the voyage. Those calling out Beyoo have a stock of venom which they can spew out into the face of enemies; though not lethal, this silences most whom it strikes, within seconds, and leaves them numb and dumb for days. Those who chant "Beyoo Fee Pee" use cunning rather than venom. They have found ways to shame the bossing persons. To them, they yell a phrase that clearly has deep meaning: it sounds like "karapschan"--the Martian word for "I know you sleep in a mating machine". They utter this phrase often and its effect has been to make the ruling ones dance wildly, beating themselves, and singing "Nevayagin. Nevayagin". In Martian, a similar sounding word means "I run now, but I will come back". But they also try to shame the dark ones, by criticizing all they do, and hoping for the return of the British. The dark ones, however, cower less and less when this occurs.

The Martians have found some who claim to be Blorgas but they are not from de Bayjans. One, whose valuable data flows freely in the Martian air, including information about the minds of de Bajans, goes by the name Leeb. He is a dark one but from over the seas, who was forced to come to the island when his flying craft had mechanical trouble. He has had problems, because he has for long breathed a form of Earth's air that is rich and pure, but now finds the air of Bahbaydas needs much filtration to avoid choking or a sense of numbness in the throat. Unlike the other Blorgas, he lives above ground, and walks among the non-mutants as a free man. He can only be distinguished from de Bayjans when his mouthpiece is used. From years of operating in clearer air, it too sputters if it cannot work in filtered air, and many de Bayjans cannot understand him easily. Some fear his words because he once was in the court of the supreme leaders, the Intergalactic Mind Force.

The Blorgas are not the rulers of the island, but they act as if they wish to be. The true rulers are known by their dark costumes and they live inside a habitat pod. They too have two tribes who look across a large room at each other wating for the other to move. They are different from most of de Bayjans, which may explain why they are in charge. Though some of them drink much of the "raham", they seem to be less affected by it, except that their tongues are never still, especially inside their pod. They too are dark ones, though some have been scarred by a bleaching compound. They have many discussions with representatives of the abandoned British, for they have never given the key to the 'pot of gold', which de Bayjans crave. The Blorgas want to change all of this, and as they can they let their venom flow or use their cunning.

Each Blorga and ruling persons' tribe's followers are fanatics. Those who work openly with the bossing persons, carry the familiar names of the island, which are few but include Holda, Eneez, Pareez, Hanes, and Hines. The fanatics of the Blorgas travel with names like Bone and Pepper, CouCou, ZR, and Bag. Such names offer few clues. The fanatics are the experts with the use of venom. But they have also developed what they think is a good weapon--the unified chant--and they are ready to surround their adversaries whom they try to quell with chants. The chants each have different power, as shown in optical images relayed to Mars. One that is very effective is "Tschoupse", which seems to mean "Die you dog!" or "Your body is withering". Another is "Cheezonbred", whihc seems to mean "Our Gods are unhappy". One more is "Laaawwddd", which seems to have no real meaning but works well to stem most comments. Lastly they will bay together "Yaadfaal", which seems to mean "bury your face on the ground and beg for mercy".

The Martians could easily be in contact with Blorgas and not know it. I hear that the first wave has already landed and begun to slip into the island. The first message that have sent back to Mars reads "British disguise is itchy. Please prepare the Chinaman models." I will try to tap into more of their transmissions.

Friday, March 06, 2009

Have We All Been Played For Fools?

A blog is meant to be somewhere to express ideas that are of the moment. A blogger is also not usually speaking for anyone other than him- or herself. So, I will be brief. I feel an amazing sense of despair from the news I got last night that Barbados' singing princess, Rihanna (Robyn Fenty), was married to Chris Brown over the past few days.

The past few weeks have given us revelations that Mr. Brown had assaulted Ms. Fenty, during a dispute on the night of the Grammy Awards that began in a rented car when the latter found a long text message on Mr. Brown's cell phone from another woman, with whom he had had a relationship (reportedly sexual). I don't know when that relationship was, or if it is ongoing. Mr. Brown was initially alleged to have assaulted Ms. Fenty brutally, with punches, scratches and bites on her head, face and hands. Some of the injuries had been seen thanks to a leaked photograph from the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). Ms. Fenty reportedly sought the comfort of her family in Barbados, while Mr. Brown seemed to get on with life much as if nothing had happened--there were pictures of him out on jet skis.

Outrage at Mr. Brown's actions had been expressed by many who know him better than me, including fellow pop stars Usher, and Jay-Z (who is also a mentor for Ms. Fenty). Their anger was clear and there were at least implicit threats to Mr. Brown.

Expressions of sympathy as well as expressions of anger greeted Ms. Fenty, but my impression is that on balance there was more sympathy. Some hoped that she would seize this moment to champion the blight of domestic violence. Perhaps, surprising to some, she remained silent regarding her own alleged suffering.

Ms. Fenty's family came into the spotlight, especially her father, whose public image had been bashed on many occasions. I heard from someone who was present how he had conducted his press interviews with US media outlets long distance from a well known local eatery.

The history of physical abuse by Mr. Brown's father and Ms. Fenty's father seeped out, not necessarily as justifications, but as understandable background. There was a chain of events and the links had not been broken.

People in Barbados, however, raised more clearly concerns that nothing would come of this incident, recalling a well-known spat between the couple at a local night club, Club Extreme. How considerable damage had been done to their room at a local major hotel chain. How cars had been damaged in moment of rage between the couple. How other major bust ups had occurred, and so on.

Stories quickly seeped out that in fact Ms. Fenty had never come back to Barbados. But also that Mr. Brown had come to Barbados. Confusion. Deception? That she had spent time in a resort in Mexico recovering. That the couple were in a process of reconciliation at the home of one P Diddy, another mega pop star.

Yesterday, LAPD Attorney's Office laid two felony charges against Mr. Brown of assault and making criminal threats (see CBC report). The sworn statement by Los Angeles Police Detective DeShon Andrews, in which he detailed what allegedly happened in the early morning hours of February 8 is a story of incredible violence. But clearly, not enough to offset the 'kiss and make' up.

Then, last night, as a group of friends met for their weekly lime, the news came out that the couple had been married recently. One of our group placed a call to someone who knows 'Robyn' well and got confirmation that the ceremony had been at the weekend. Gasps followed. Words that I cannot write here were uttered by learned men. Dismay was expressed by most of us. I joked that I would not be surprised to hear that Ms. Fenty is pregnant. This morning, I have seen at least one report that says the same thing. I said "We have all be played for fools." A cynical part of me speculated about how this could also have been a bizarre and morbid pop industry set-up.

I am not a Bajan, so do not express national outrage. I wonder how this 'daughter of the soil' sits comfortably as a social ambassador for her country. I wont pretend that I can understand Ms. Fenty and wonder about those around her who offer her advice and guidance. I wonder who really is her friend and who is really just there for their piece of the lucrative pie that she has become.

I will let those who feel they can defend either or both of these young people can go ahead. I think it's a nonsense to call them children, though they are very young. If their youth is now a problem, then it must have been a problem before: they are older now. Are they mature? To my mind, not very. Are they misguided or badly guided? I would say very certainly. Are they mercenaries? I will ponder that, as some suggested that the wedding was about 'saving careers' and noting that wives cannot testify in certain cases against the husband. More of that will come out as the police proceed with their case.

All of this leaves a really bad taste in my mouth.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Why We Need To Know About Politicians' Assets

A very good reason to argue for politicians to disclose their assets is to remove as much as possible the taint of possible conflicts of interest. I stress possible. More generally, one should have complete confidence that a politician's decisions are as neutral as possible. I hope that we are not so naive as to believe that politicians are not capable of being influenced. They are humans, not gods, and they have personal feelings that are both good and bad. They have friends and enemies. But, we want to feel a sense of assurance that these things come to bear as little as possible. Now, we know that politicians can be very partisan and it's bad enough to see a politician working to favour his/her party supporters in the constituency, while doing things to discriminate against those who favour or voted for the opposition.

The recent financial troubles befalling CL Financial Group's Trinidad operations and now the levelling of fraud charges amount to US$ 8 billion by the US Securities and Exchange Commission against Allan Stanford and his Antigua-registered Stanford Financial Group point to one aspect of the possible conflicts in our own back yard. To what extent are politicians personally tied to the ailing institution or those who run them? To the extent that such ties exist, how has it affected or will it affect political and policy decisions? The Antiguan government was very cozy with Mr. Stanford, and with elections now set for next month, that may have a very bad bearing on the outcome for the ruling party. Barbados' former central bank governor,is on the Board. With Mr. Stanford going AWOL (reportedly in St. Croix, US Virgin Island), the trail to find him and his assets may lead to some unwelcome doors. The parallels with the Madoff scam are immediate: steady returns (though by offering a 'certificate of deposit' such steadiness is less odd); using an obscure accounting firm (three men and no dog), called CAS Hewlett--originally run from Antigua--to check his books; claiming substantial analytical and research backing for investments, etc. Stanford's bank, fittingly some would say, lost money in the Madoff scam.

The public can ask legitimately the question, "If my politician is/has been the beneficiary of payments from company X (or its head), can I expect that politician to deal impartially with issues to do with company X (or its head)?" Or, very simply, "If my politician has substantial investments with company X, how do I determine that his/her actions are not motivated by self-interest?" In places like the US and UK, politicians are obliged to distance themselves from their investments or controlling interests, or at least be seen to do. This could come in the form of 'blind trusts', for example, which handle investments while the politicians' hands are supposedly freed of such control.

Former US Vice President, Dick Cheney, is an interesting study. He was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Halliburton, a Fortune 500 company and market leader in the energy sector. Mr. Cheney resigned as CEO of Halliburton on July 2000, when he became vice president; he argued that this step removed any conflict of interest. Mr. Cheney's net worth, estimated to be between US$30 million and US$100 million, is largely derived from his post at Halliburton, as well as the Cheneys gross income of nearly US$9 million. However, Mr. Cheney had headed President Bush II's vice-presidential search committee in 2000, while still head of Halliburton. President Bush then surprised some by asking Mr. Cheney himself to join the Republican ticket. Halliburton's contracts with the US government during the Iraq war always raise questions about the links with Mr. Cheney, remembering that he had also been Secretary of Defence under President Bush I (in the 1990s). Awkward to say the least. Time (and the disclosure of currently classified information) will tell to what extent Mr. Cheney and his connections had a bearing on important decisions of the last Bush administration.

If I understand the workings of many administrative and legal processes, decision makers can recuse themselves when their discussion or decision has a bearing on a related company (or person). This is good, but is not easy to monitor if one does not know of asset ownership or relationships. Facts may come out later that could embarrass the decision maker. In the Stanford case, the list of political contributions has already led Congressman Charlie Rangel to offer to pay over US$ 10,000 to a charity, representing a contribution he received from Stanford. That gesture alone does not do all the washing needed to make Mr. Rangel clean, because there is still the question of what did Mr. Rangel do for Mr. Stanford, if anything, as a 'sign of appreciation' for the generous contribution?

As the Madoff and Stanford cases unfold many will try to be wise after the event and a host of actions will now seem to be clear signs of fraud or other wrong doing, but at the time they were either seen and ignored or not seen (see Bloomberg report on some of the 'creative' marketing of Stanford).

Americans, who were the main target as customers, are now alerted to the problems of investments with Stanford. For them, a good system exists for getting information disclosed and investigative procedures are very well developed. Very little will not be uncovered. In the Caribbean we are not so blessed. We have lots of sunshine but we rarely get good light to shine on controversial issues, especially if 'big people' are involved. Our deference is legend and our unwillingness to make people answer to obvious charges of wrong doing or irresponsibility is also legend: we will wait to see what comes from another Antiguan debacle in the form of the botch up over the cricket test match that had to be abandoned. A Japanese politician resigns for being accused of drunkenness at a recent press conference. Imagine a Caribbean politician doing the same. We do not see 'wrongness' the same as others.

As we in the region look at images of people in Antigua lining up to withdraw deposits from Bank of Antigua we may say "Oh, Lord, thank you for keeping my money safe." The indications are that our region's BoA (domestic bank) is not directly linked to Standford International Bank Ltd. (offshore), which is the focus of the US authorities' charges. The East Caribbean Central Bank's Governor was quick to state that BoA is 'sound' and warned depositors to not precipitate problems by hastily withdrawing their funds (see Barbados Advocate report). Nevertheless, fear reigned and long lines formed to do just that, according to reports I have seen and heard. People reportedly flew to Antigua to hastily try to get their hands on their money. No Internet banking? An acquaintance of mine in Antigua, who is in property development, told me that he managed to get out all of his money; he was a lucky one as an asset freeze is supposed to be in place. In his words, "Waited from sunrise - 7 hours at Scamford bank to get money. I was one of the few that got through. This has been a long time coming, for those that watch international news it comes as no surprise, interesting that my actions were alerted from UK, and my exact dress was described in real time from those in UK. Scary! But thankful. Best n Bless."

It is interesting that the Venezuelan government was quick to take over the Venezuelan arm of Standford's bank as line formed of hopeful depositors wanting their money. Other Latin American governments have done the same and more may follow, given about half of the investors in Stanford were from that region, and Venezuelans alone invested some US$3 billion (see Wall Street Journal report). The drug money laundering charges now surfacing may be one factor behind this.

Who knows what really goes on in 'smoke-filled rooms' or gets discussed at the golf or tennis club, or is resolved in the bathrooms between people who are closely connected. When a friend who is also in a position of power calls a politician late at night, or any time, it is rarely just to check on what was eaten for dinner or what shirt is being worn. It's about something felt to be substantial. Where you have extensive record-keeping of officials' actions, as in say the US political system, there is a record of almost everything, so it's a wonder how a politician can hope to keep anything untoward hidden. We, again, do not have all of that paraphernalia. So, we need a lot more of the 'honour system'. Part of that is a willingness to say openly and honestly what is owned and how was it obtained; what is earned and for doing what, etc. Tom Daschle, who recently had to withdraw from nomination as President Obama's Secreatary of Health over unpaid taxes raised questions about himself too when people heard about the money he earned from consulting and speeches after losing his Senate seat. Former President Clinton had to disclose a lot of information about the funding of his foundations and his income sources in order for his wife, then Senator Hillary Clinton, to pass muster as nominee for Secretary of State. Was there a possible risk of the links with Bill being seen as intruding on American foreign policy?

Caribbean people like to keep their business private. We tend to bridle at what we see as 'meddling with our things'. Just look at the disgusted reactions when we are searched at Immigration and our distaste for people rummaging through our belongings. Cricket World Cup was as much a failure because of a lack of understanding of our intolerance for being searched, especially when we are 'convinced' that we are not hiding anything. That view tends to extend to a tolerance of our leaders keeping their business private, even if much of it is publicly known: "Yes, that's the big man's house. He built it for his sweetheart. Sure, his wife knows about how he's always fooling around with that other woman; look how the children have his nose. But you know how it is, man."

No politician should have anything to hide from the populace. If such a thing exists, then it must be a threat to the politician's good judgement. If he/she messes with underage boys/girls in public bathrooms and that is illegal then he/she better look out. If he/she consorts with prostitutes or criminals then he/she better be prepared to explain why there is unlikely to be any undue influence exerted by these nefarious relations. If moneys earned are for anything other than legitimate billable hours then let's hear why they are alright. No one should be immune from such questioning if they are public servants, and no amount of high dudgeon and running out of radio studios instead of answering the question will cut it. Sure, the declarations can be false, and we should do whatever we can to make that possibility less. Poor old Senator Roland Burris now has to reconcile what he said under oath with what he is now saying openly. The law will work its way, but the politician should avoid that having to be the only way that the public gets to see what is behind the person. Usually, if it gets to the legal stage then things are already sour. So, keep things sweet.

Sunday, October 05, 2008

A Bitter Taste of Barbados.

The Taste of Barbados week got off to an inauspicious start for me. I had more than a tinge of disappointment as I left Apsara restaurant last night, near midnight, after a dinner event, with "celebrity" chef, Madhur Jaffrey. Ms. Jaffrey is often touted as the “Julia Child of Indian Cookery”, and has been honoured internationally for her services to drama and the promotion of Indian food and culture.

The meal and its food were nice enough, but once again I wonder what this tourist venue called Barbados is really putting together to attract patrons. Money can't buy everything and in Barbados I'm one of those who believes that it buys you very little.

My wife and I are lovers of Indian food and wanted to sample meals prepared by one of the most renowned cooks on this cuisine. That's why we shelled out B$160 each, and encouraged a bunch of friends to join us. Maybe I went with the wrong expectations. At any ordinary restaurant evening you are often bombarded by an array of descriptions of "tonight's specials" to tempt you. So, why at this special event should I have to imagine what the menu listings meant? Sure, it was not a cooking seminar, but why could the event not have had a time for the chef to visit each table and just spend a few moments talking about the meal or particular dishes?Why would that only happen for those tables who "requested" it? And if that was to be the case, why was that simple point not made clear at some stage between buying the ticket and ending the meal? Another case of the customer not really counting for much? Why should each course be some 30 minutes apart?

Sure, we get miffed when the drinks we ask for as cocktails cannot be had. I get more miffed when the wine I request is the one wine that is not available. Take it off the list! I don't have a visceral anger about these goings on, in part because I've learned to lessen my expectations. But it need not be so.

Madhur Jaffrey has a deservedly great reputation, and is multi-talented, with experience in film and television. So, I was surprised that she did not make an appearance near our table, though we saw her roving around other tables. Should we have paid extra for that "privilege".

I would have loved to hear at least a word from the food guru on how she had prepared one or some of dishes, or where in Barbados I could hope to get some of the ingredients. We have been trying our hand and cooking Indian dishes for years and here was a chance to learn from one of the best. Sigh.

The way the feeding was organized seemed to be some sort of disjointed affair. It's final bizarre element came with the serving of the main course (Sri Lankan red curry), for which the accompaniment arrived 30 minutes before the meal itself! So, we ate what we had in front of us, hot, and waited....and waited...for the main meal to arrive. Had we been forgotten? When we asked for more of the accompanying naan bread to go with the meal, we were told...40 minutes later...after we had got dessert...that there was none left. You have to put on a NISE smile.

The restaurant staff was clearly stretched and for this event, where every table was occupied, additional serving staff had been brought in. But blame should not be on their shoulders, as they were not the organizers merely the providers. Although "unprofessional" in saying so, we had to agree with one of their comments that the food took too long and that the staffing seemed inadequate.

Lessons learned? Sorry to say it, don't expect too much from this kind of event. Service excellence? Still a long way off.